The Enricher · accent Humanist
Real ambition on product value — but Data & Foundation lags the ambition, and knowledge holders read that gap differently.
Beyond the hype
Most AI advice starts with the technology. QWYQ starts with your organisation: what you want AI to do, what your people and data can carry today, and where your knowledge holders see it differently. No score out of a hundred — a profile, and a path that fits it.
We're inviting the first 100 organisations.
Real ambition on product value — but Data & Foundation lags the ambition, and knowledge holders read that gap differently.
Six outcomes, none of them a single number — because one number tells the wrong story about AI.
Your primary implementation profile plus at most one accent. The profile determines the route: what to try first, and what to settle before scaling.
Where you stand today and where you want to be — per building block. An incomplete scan shows a dash, never a number.
Per building block you see not just where you stand, but how much sits between current and ambition — and so where investment is needed most. The biggest gap is your sharpest finding.
Where your knowledge holders score the same block differently, that difference is itself a finding. The report makes the spread per building block visible — the starting point for the right conversation.
Weighted by the focus of your profile, with a direction per action: leadership, team, or both together. No timeline — parallel steps you can start now.
Every phase ends with a re-measurement and an explicit go/no-go. Re-measurements never overwrite an earlier one — over time you get a trend, not a snapshot.
Example output shown — your profile and radar are built from your answers.
Both are open to every organisation, from startup to enterprise. You choose; the product doesn't choose for you.
This is the shape of the product — and why the outcome is worth something.
Per building block — job titles differ per organisation. Everyone answers Philosophy & Vision.
15–20 minutes per person, and you only see your own part. Answers combine on their own.
The outcome emerges once several people have finished — a picture no single person could have drawn.
Multiple people filling in the same blocks makes difference of insight measurable — per building block, the spread between knowledge holders. That difference is itself a finding, and often the most valuable one.
Schematic example — the report shows the spread per building block for your organisation.
Each block is scored twice: current maturity and desired ambition.
The lens, not a score — it colours how all blocks are read. Everyone answers it, whatever their block.
One primary profile, at most one accent. "Starter" is not a profile — every organisation starts somewhere; the profile says where you're heading.
AI as an accelerator of existing work: faster processes, time won back, fewer repetitive tasks. The route starts small and compounding — visible wins that build trust before anything scales.
AI inside the product or service itself: smarter features, sharper answers, more value per customer. The route runs through your product decisions — and through the data your product already earns.
Adoption, skills and the quality of work come first. AI relieves people rather than replaces them. The route invests in fluency across the organisation before it invests in tooling.
AI as a source of new propositions and market positions. The route accepts more experiment risk — and needs a leadership that can tell a promising failure from a dead end.
Processes, roles and the operating model are rethought with AI as a given. The most demanding profile — the route needs governance, re-measurement and patience in equal measure.
Combination and priority follow from your profile. Phase re-measurements come with an explicit go/no-go.
Individual use of assistants: questions, drafts, analysis. The lowest threshold — and where fluency starts.
AI as a colleague on real work: files, tasks and repeatable workflows, with a person in the loop.
Delegated work: agents that complete multi-step tasks within agreed boundaries and report back.
AI built into your own systems and product — from feature to infrastructure.
Your own models or fine-tuning where the shelf doesn't fit. Rarely the first step; sometimes the right one.
The clearest answer to “what do I actually get?” is a real one. The AI example report — profile, radar, misalignment — is in the making; our research publications show the thinking behind it today.
The people who know — per building block. That's not a side note but the shape of the product: a knowledge holder per block, everyone answers Philosophy & Vision, and the consolidated picture emerges once several people are done. The quick scan is the one-person exception.
No — a profile, with per building block your current maturity and your ambition. One number would flatten exactly what matters: the gap between where you are and where you want to be, and where stakeholders disagree. That's also why an incomplete scan shows a dash, never a number.
Then that's a finding, not a problem. The misalignment report makes the spread per building block visible — the conversation it triggers is usually worth more than any average.
No. The questions are in plain business language, and each block goes to the person who knows that part of the organisation.
The quick scan takes minutes. The assessment takes 15–20 minutes per person, spread over the people you involve — most organisations have the baseline within a week, without anyone clearing an afternoon.
Start with the quick scan, or bring your team into the assessment.
Start the AI assessment