Who can access what?
Risk is still higher than the team wants until someone owns access — and the team has practised what to do when something breaks.
Beyond the threat
Cyber risk is usually sold with fear or buried in technical detail. QWYQ does neither: guided questions, in plain language, that end in a number you can take to the board — with everything underneath it to act on.
We're inviting the first 100 organisations.
Risk is still higher than the team wants until someone owns access — and the team has practised what to do when something breaks.
Seven outcomes, from the amount to the roadmap. The amount gets the attention; everything underneath it tells you what to do about it.
Expected annual loss from a Monte Carlo simulation on your maturity scores, sector profile and revenue — always with a range. Plus what a severe year looks like (VaR95: EUR 29M) and a catastrophic one (TVaR95: EUR 70M).
The probability your organisation is hit this year — here roughly once per 13 years. A low annual chance with a high scenario impact means: rare but heavy. That combination calls for risk transfer alongside prevention.
Where you stand on identity, infrastructure, data, detection & response and compliance — with each domain's contribution to the total risk made explicit, so you can see which weakness costs you the most.
Your maturity per domain, set against the benchmark for organisations of your sector and size. A score of 2 means little on its own; a 2 where your sector sits at 4 is a different conversation than a 2 where the sector sits at 2. The comparison is built from anonymised, aggregated assessments — you see a position, never another organisation's data.
Ransomware, data breach, outage — each as a plain-language storyline in three severities: likely, severe and catastrophic. Including where the money goes: direct recovery, lost revenue and reputation, fines.
For every framework that applies to you: the status, the gaps and their priority. Compliance becomes a worklist instead of a worry — and the frameworks follow from your region and sector, not from a sales pitch.
A prioritised list of measures with the projected risk reduction per measure, in euros. The 'Must do' items at the top deliver the largest reduction on the shortest term — your investment route, in order.
Figures shown are from a real, anonymised assessment (Technology · Scale-up) — your outcome is calculated from your answers.
These are model-based estimates, always shown with a range. They exist to prioritise — not to predict the future to the euro.
Both are open to every organisation, from startup to enterprise. You choose; the product doesn't choose for you.
Each domain is scored on maturity 1–5; Governance weighs the outcome.
The lens, not a score — it weighs the outcome. Little documentation and audit means controls probably perform worse than you estimate yourself.
The clearest answer to “what do I actually get?” is a real one. We publish anonymised example reports — from startup to enterprise.
It's a model-based estimate, always shown with a range — built from your maturity scores, sector profile and revenue via a Monte Carlo simulation. It's made to prioritise decisions, not to predict losses to the euro. That's also why we never show it without the range.
No. An audit inspects systems; QWYQ asks guided questions and turns them into a leadership-level picture: what's at risk, what it could cost and what to tackle first.
No. The questions are in plain business language. Where technical knowledge helps, involve the person who knows — the answers combine naturally.
QWYQ is self-service: your own team answers, the model does the work, and the outcome is yours to act on — or to hand to an advisor with a much sharper brief.
The quick scan takes minutes. The full assessment is ±86 questions in plain language — most organisations complete it comfortably within a working session.
Start with the quick scan, or go straight to the assessment.
Keep me posted